TURNING CANCER BIOLOGY INTO BETTER DECISIONS.

The decision-making platform for oncology drug development.

Clyra helps biopharma teams define the right patients and biomarker strategy before a trial, then identify response and resistance biomarkers to guide the next phase of development.

Built for oncology translational and clinical development teams.

BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE

Molecular

Cellular

Clinical

Outcomes

DEVELOPMENT DECISION

A clear population, biomarker, or next-phase strategy

USE CASES

Make the next development decision with better biological evidence.

BEFORE A TRIAL

AFTER EARLY CLINICAL DATA

BEFORE A TRIAL

Patient & Population Decisions

Define the right patients and biomarker strategy before your trial begins.

Characterize disease heterogeneity, define biologically grounded subgroups, and translate the evidence into a practical biomarker strategy.

Explore Patient & Population Decisions

AFTER EARLY CLINICAL DATA

Clinical Trial Decisions

Clinical Trial Decisions

Identify response and resistance biomarkers and refine your next trial phase.

Analyze early trial data to understand responders and non-responders, surface response and resistance biology, and guide the next phase.

Analyze early trial data to understand responders and non-responders, surface response and resistance biology, and guide the next phase.

Explore Clinical Trial Decisions

More data does not automatically produce a better decision.

Oncology programs still struggle with heterogeneous patient populations, small cohorts, fragmented datasets, and biomarkers that do not translate cleanly into development strategy. Clyra organizes molecular, cellular, clinical, and outcome evidence around the specific decision a program needs to make.

Evidence organized around the decision criteria

FROM QUESTION TO DECISION

Built around the decision—not the dataset.

01

Frame the decision

Define the asset, indication, development stage, and decision criteria.

02

Assemble the evidence

Connect relevant human data, program data, and complementary longitudinal evidence when it adds value.

03

Model the biology

Characterize tumor states, patient subgroups, biomarkers, and outcome associations.

04

Translate the result

Turn the evidence into a population, biomarker, or next-phase strategy—with assumptions and limitations made explicit.

CORE CAPABILITIES

One platform. Decision-specific workflows.

Multimodal cohort characterization

Understand the molecular, cellular, clinical, and outcome context of a patient population.

Tumor-state and subgroup discovery

Identify biologically distinct states that may be hidden by conventional disease classifications.

Biomarker prioritization and validation

Compare candidate biomarkers across cohorts, modalities, and relevant biological contexts.

Response and resistance analysis

Identify the features associated with sensitivity, non-response, adaptation, and recurrence when treatment-linked data are available.

DATA & MODELS

More evidence where human cohorts are limited.

More evidence where human cohorts are limited.

More evidence where human cohorts are limited.

Clyra combines multimodal human cancer data with longitudinal molecular, treatment, and outcome data from naturally occurring canine cancers. This additional evidence is especially valuable in rare and hard-to-model cancers, where human cohorts are small and outcome data can take years to accumulate.

Clyra combines multimodal human cancer data with longitudinal molecular, treatment, and outcome data from naturally occurring canine cancers. This additional evidence is especially valuable in rare and hard-to-model cancers, where human cohorts are small and outcome data can take years to accumulate.

Human evidence remains central to every human oncology conclusion.

Human evidence

Primary for human oncology conclusions

Program data

Complementary longitudinal evidence

INITIAL FOCUS

Starting with osteosarcoma.

Human osteosarcoma is rare, heterogeneous, and difficult to study in large prospective cohorts. Naturally occurring canine osteosarcoma provides an additional source of longitudinal cancer evidence. Clyra uses both to study tumor states, biomarkers, and outcomes while keeping species-specific differences explicit.

We are starting with osteosarcoma and expanding into other rare and hard-to-model cancers.

What decision does your program need to make?

If you are defining a trial population, building a biomarker strategy, or interpreting early clinical data, let’s discuss the program.